The US Defence Industry Has Finally Discovered European Cyber Talent Exists
When Leidos significantly expanded its UK cyber operations, building on an already substantial presence with 1,300 UK staff and major contracts with the Home Office, Ministry of Defence and Metropolitan Police, it wasn't just another American company maintaining a satellite office. It was the loudest signal yet that US defence contractors have finally woken up to the reality they've been fighting for years: they can't fill their cyber roles with US nationals alone.
I've spent six years placing ethical hackers and security architects at these firms. Until recently, most US defence contractors treated international recruitment like a necessary evil rather than a strategic advantage. That's changed dramatically.
The talent shortage has simply become too acute.
Why Now? Three Factors Driving This Shift
The skills gap is the first driver. Three of my DC-based clients currently have over 3,000 unfilled cyber roles between them. Not "we'd like to hire more people" but actual funded, approved headcount they simply cannot fill domestically.
The second driver is the CHIPS and Science Act, signed in 2022 and with funding flowing through the ecosystem since 2023-2024 Those billions in semiconductor and advanced computing investments? They need securing. And guess what happens when you throw money at a problem without addressing the underlying talent pipeline?
(You create a bidding war, which is exactly what's happening in cleared cyber roles right now.)
The third driver, which nobody in the industry likes acknowledging, is that US universities aren't producing enough qualified candidates. Last placement season I watched Raytheon try to fill 15 entry-level cyber positions in their Boston office. They received exactly seven qualified applicants.
Three Very Different Approaches to Poaching UK Talent
Interesting to see how differently these firms are approaching international recruitment. I'm seeing three distinct strategies play out:
-
The Booz Allen Hamilton approach: They're building what they call "skills transfer teams" - essentially hiring UK security professionals specifically to train up their US counterparts. Contracts typically run 18-24 months with hefty completion bonuses. This appeals most to mid-career professionals who want the US experience without permanently relocating.
-
The Raytheon model: Straight-up aggressive poaching. They've increased UK cyber salaries by 35-40% across the board since January. Had a client offer £165K base for a cyber threat intel director last week - that's proper London finance money for what used to be a £120K role tops.
-
The Leidos long game: Building actual capability centres outside the US. Their Reading campus isn't just a recruitment office - it's a proper security operations hub. They're investing in the infrastructure to keep talent in place rather than relocating everyone stateside.
Beyond Tick Boxes: Diversity Recruitment Strategies That Actually Transform UK Workplaces
Master the Virtual Hot Seat: 7 Video Interview Techniques Recruiters Don't Tell You
How to Master 'Tell Me About Yourself' Interview Question: UK Expert Insights
Clearance Realities - The Sticking Point
Most prime contractor roles still require some level of clearance, and that creates massive headaches for international recruitment.
Lots of my clients have started splitting their security functions - putting cleared work in US-only teams while creating international units for everything that can be done at lower classification levels. Smart move, but it creates two-tier workforces which brings its own problems.
Getting a first-time Secret or even Public Trust clearance for a UK national takes ages. I placed someone at Northrop Grumman back in February who still hasn't started because their clearance is pending. The candidate's basically in limbo.
Some companies are handling this better than others. Booz Allen has started putting candidates through their internal training programmes during the clearance wait time, which keeps them engaged. Others just leave people twisting in the wind.
What UK Professionals Need to Know About US Defence Contracts
If you're weighing up a move to the US defence sector, here are the reality checks nobody tells you:
-
The money looks amazing... until you factor in healthcare costs, especially if you have a family. Always negotiate a proper health package.
-
Contract structures are totally different. "Full time" often means "contingent on contract renewal" which happens every 1-3 years. Ask about the contract vehicle your role sits under.
-
Work-life balance varies massively by location. DC projects = long hours. Colorado Springs or Huntsville postings = much more reasonable.
-
The clearance process is utterly opaque. Prepare for it to take 2-3x whatever timeline they tell you.
I've had five candidates accept offers then bail during the clearance wait period in the last quarter alone. Can't blame them, but it drives clients mad.
Where This Market Is Really Heading
The industry's going through massive consolidation - L3Harris acquiring Viasat's tactical data links business, RTX (formerly Raytheon) merging divisions - and this creates both opportunity and risk for candidates.
Contracts are getting bigger and fewer, which means less competition for talent between primes. Don't be surprised if the salary inflation we're seeing now starts to level off by early 2027.
Smarter candidates are using this moment to lock in long-term arrangements. I just placed a UK threat hunting specialist with Leidos on a three-year contract with guaranteed annual increases built in.
But the biggest mistake I see? People chasing the money without understanding the culture. These organisations run on their own peculiar operating systems. The adjustment can be brutal if you're coming from commercial cybersecurity.
If you're considering this move, talk to someone who's already made it. Buy them a pint. Ask the difficult questions. The gulf between commercial and defence cybersecurity isn't just about the work - it's about the entire professional ecosystem you're entering.
Pentagon dollars are attractive. But they come with Pentagon bureaucracy attached.
And sometimes that's a price too high for UK talent that has plenty of options closer to home.
