Last month, I watched a London agency lose three clients in a single week. Their media team had been operating at half capacity for nearly three months, with two senior roles unfilled and a stretched interim strategy director who'd handed in her notice. Client work suffered. Deadlines slipped. The agency director kept assuring everyone they were "just waiting for the perfect candidate."
They're still waiting. And they're down £280K in annual retainer fees.
I'm not being dramatic when I say slow PR hiring is an extinction-level event for communications teams. The 45-day mark is when things start to crumble, badly. By 60 days, you're in free fall.
After 12 years placing PR talent and watching hiring patterns across London agencies, I've spotted the warning signs of impending collapse. The worst part? Most hiring managers still think they're being diligent by extending searches. They're not. They're killing their departments.
The Breaking Point: When Gaps Become Chasms
The Communications Gap Index (recently published by CIPR) confirms what those of us in the trenches have seen for years, UK comms teams are operating with critical talent holes. But the real killer isn't just having unfilled positions. It's the exponential damage that happens when those gaps persist past the 45-day mark.
When a PR vacancy stays open too long, three predictable things happen:
- Remaining team members pick up the slack until they burn out, then leave too
- Institutional knowledge evaporates as senior staff move client relationships to their new employers
- Strategic work gets replaced by reactive firefighting
Couldn't be more straightforward, yet I've watched dozens of PR directors miss these warning signs until it's far too late.
Beyond Tick Boxes: Diversity Recruitment Strategies That Actually Transform UK Workplaces
Master the Virtual Hot Seat: 7 Video Interview Techniques Recruiters Don't Tell You
How to Master 'Tell Me About Yourself' Interview Question: UK Expert Insights
Why Comms Teams Are Different From Other Departments
PR and communications aren't like other business functions. When your sales team is understaffed, you might lose some leads. When your comms team is understaffed, you lose your entire market voice.
Media relationships are fundamentally personal. They're built on trust, consistent delivery, and genuine rapport that takes months or years to develop. When your media relations specialist leaves and that position stays vacant for six weeks, those journalist relationships don't politely wait for you to fill the role. They evaporate.
Or worse, they transfer to whatever agency your former employee just joined.
One agency head I worked with last spring put it perfectly: "We're not hiring people. We're hiring relationships."
Right. So why are you taking two months to do it?
The Real Numbers Behind PR Collapse
The PR recruitment market in 2026 looks nothing like it did three years ago. Competition has intensified dramatically, especially for mid-level talent with 3-7 years of experience.
Talent acquisition teams are still operating on outdated timelines. The best PR candidates are receiving multiple offers within 10 days of becoming available. Many never formally enter the job market at all, moving through networks of former colleagues and LinkedIn connections.
The days of 4-6 week interview processes are utterly disconnected from market reality. By week three, your ideal candidate has already accepted a position elsewhere.
But what's truly disturbing is how quickly PR teams deteriorate without key positions filled. Client complaints typically surge after just 3-4 weeks of understaffing. By week six, campaign metrics start showing measurable decline. And once you hit that 45-day vacancy threshold, remaining team members start updating their CVs.
The Domino Effect of One Key Vacancy
Let me walk you through a case I witnessed firsthand earlier this year at a healthcare PR specialist.
Week 1-2: Account Director leaves, team seems fine
Week 3-4: Senior Account Manager now doing two jobs
Week 5-6: SAM misses family holiday, becomes resentful
Week 7-8: Account Executive starts making mistakes due to lack of oversight
Week 9: SAM resigns, cites burnout
Week 10: Major pharma client puts account under review
Week 12: Two more team members resign
One vacancy turned into four, and a stable client base became precarious. All because the hiring process stretched on while the department burned.
What's Causing These Deadly Delays?
Why are PR departments allowing this slow-motion disaster to happen? From what I've observed, it comes down to three primary factors:
-
Unrealistic candidate expectations. Directors wanting unicorns who are simultaneously strategic visionaries and hands-on doers, have deep sector expertise but also fresh perspectives, can lead teams but also do the grinding work. This mythical being doesn't exist, folks.
-
Process paralysis. Too many stakeholders, too many interview rounds, and directors who can't commit. I recently worked with an agency that required seven interview stages for a mid-level role. Seven! The best candidate withdrew after round four, took another offer, and is thriving elsewhere.
-
Budget disconnection. PR salary expectations have shifted dramatically post-pandemic. Hiring managers working from 2023 salary bands are wasting everyone's time. The candidates you want are commanding 15-20% more than they were even 18 months ago.
But the real root cause? Fear of making the wrong hire. This fear is understandable but misplaced. A mediocre hire who can be developed is infinitely better than a prolonged vacancy that destroys your entire team.
Proven Acceleration Strategies That Work
Reputation-conscious brands and agencies have realized they need a completely different approach to PR hiring. Here's what I've seen work:
1. The 24-Hour Feedback Rule
Implement a strict policy: Feedback to candidates within 24 hours of interview. No exceptions. This alone cuts your hiring timeline by 30-40%. It also dramatically improves candidate experience and signals that you're serious about them.
The PR director at a fintech agency I work with implemented this rule earlier this year. Their time-to-hire dropped from 52 days to just 19.
2. Compress, Don't Eliminate
You don't need fewer evaluation points, you need them concentrated. One agency I work with now does a single "super day" with multiple stakeholders rather than dragging candidates back for five separate meetings over three weeks.
This format reveals how candidates handle pressure, how they adapt to different conversation styles, and, critically, shows respect for their time.
3. Pre-Cleared Compensation
Salary negotiations that start after final interviews are a recipe for disaster. Smart PR employers now present compensation frameworks at first interview and ensure hiring managers have pre-approval for packages within reasonable ranges.
This eliminates the dreaded "let me check with finance" delay that so often loses top candidates.
4. The Deliberate Overlap
Companies that retain PR talent have learned this essential lesson: Always try to hire the replacement before the predecessor leaves. Even a week of overlap preserves more institutional knowledge than the most detailed handover document.
One corporate communications director I know builds two weeks of overlap into every senior hire. It's expensive in the short term but delivers enormous value in continuity.
5. Network Cultivation Before Need
The strongest PR departments I work with maintain relationships with potential future hires long before positions open. They regularly engage with former employees, near-miss candidates from previous searches, and promising talent they meet at industry events.
When a role does come available, they already have a shortlist of warm leads who understand their culture.
If You're Already in the Danger Zone
What if you're reading this while already sitting on a 45+ day vacancy in your PR team? Here's your rescue plan:
-
Acknowledge the emergency. This is a crisis requiring immediate action, not careful deliberation. You don't have the luxury of perfect hiring.
-
Consider interim solutions. Bring in experienced freelancers or contractors while continuing your search. Even at premium day rates, this costs less than a collapsed team.
-
Dramatically simplify your process. Cut your interview stages in half. Make decisions within 48 hours. Present offers verbally before paperwork is finalized.
-
Protect remaining team members. Implement immediate support for your existing staff. Bring in temporary help, adjust client expectations, and potentially increase compensation for those carrying extra load.
-
Reset expectations. The perfect candidate doesn't exist. Hire for core competencies and cultural alignment, then develop the rest.
The London PR landscape in 2026 is unforgiving. Talent has options, clients expect continuity, and teams need stability. The agencies and comms departments that thrive are those that have fundamentally reimagined their hiring timelines.
Slow hiring isn't careful hiring. In today's PR environment, it's organizational suicide.
But it's also fixable. I've seen teams transform their hiring approach in weeks, not months. The question is whether you'll make these changes proactively or after watching your communications capability crumble.
I know which option I'd recommend.
Sophie Chen spent 12 years leading consumer PR campaigns for top London agencies before becoming a specialist communications recruiter. Find skilled PR talent for your team through The OHub's PR recruitment platform or explore advanced solutions for complex communications hires via their premium headhunting service.


